Josef “Jeff” Sipek

Kill Bill: Vol. 1

Rating: 3.5 stars (out of 5)

Warning: The following text is not guaranteed to be spoiler free. Reader’s discretion advised.

Well, Kill Bill: Vol. 1 is much like Quentin Tarantino’s other film Pulp Fiction, that is, the movie is told non-sequentially. It is not as interleaved as Pulp Fiction, where you have about 4 stories told at the same time. Basic story is, a wedding is interrupted by 5 assassins, they kill everyone, or so they think. Some time later, the former bride wakes up from a coma, gets very aggravated, and starts killing the assassins. By the movies end, she gets two. My guess is, she’ll get the rest in Volume 2.

The one thing that made me give this movie 3.5 stars is the silliness of the fight scenes. It made me look at the movie as a comedy, more than a YAAF™. Without this humorous view, interesting camera effects and non-sequentiality, this would be just a sub-par action flick.

She killed them all!

4 Comments »

  1. I didn't like this movie at all. I don't get why people think it's good. To me it was a very sad imitation of japaneese samurai movies

    Comment by [unknown] — January 1, 1970 @ 00:00

  2. Yeah, the only reason why I watched the whole thing was the silliness of the fights. Without them, it would have been about 2 stars from me :) There are _many_ better action films out there.

    Comment by [unknown] — January 1, 1970 @ 00:00

  3. Zatoichi (the blind swordsman) is quite nice, I saw it recently, with a touch of nice japanese humor.

    Comment by [unknown] — January 1, 1970 @ 00:00

  4. I'll try to find it somewhere and watch it. Thanks for the tip.

    Comment by [unknown] — January 1, 1970 @ 00:00

Atom feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by blahgd